Report Course Evaluation, FRTF20
Basic facts
| Course name | Applied Robotics |
| Course code | FRTF20
Course syllabus |
| ECTS credits | 7.5 |
| Year | 201920 |
| Study period the course was finished | HT_LP1 |
| Programme | all |
| Registrated students | 58 |
| Number and share of passed students | 52 / 90 % |
| Number answers and response rate | 18 / 31 % |
| Number answers from males | 14 |
| Number answers from females | 4 |
|
Study hours according the curricula
| Lectures | 28 h |
| Group work | 22 h |
| Laboratories | 8 h |
| Time with supervisor | 20 h |
| Self study time | 100 h |
| |
Summary of questionnaires
The CEQ-score span between -100 och +100, there -100 means that "I fully disagree to the statement" and +100 "I fully agree to the statement".
Presence at teaching
| Part of teaching | Number | Share |
| 0-30 % | 0 | 0 % |
| 30-70 % | 5 | 28 % |
| 70-100 % | 13 | 72 % |
Scales and questions
| Scale | Score | StdDev |
| Good Teaching | +48 | 49 |
| Clear Goals and Standards | +10 | 43 |
| Appropriate Assessment | +73 | 25 |
| Appropriate Workload | +33 | 27 |
| Special questions | | |
| The course seems important for my education | +56 | 54 |
| Overall, I am satisfied with this course | +53 | 50 |
|
|
Distribution of the answers from question 26:
"Overall, I am satisfied with this course"
| | Number | Share |
|
| Dissatisfied (<0) | 2 | 11 % |
| Neutral (0) | 2 | 11 % |
| Satisfied (>0) | 14 | 78 % |
| No answer | 0 | 0 % |
|
| Mean of CEQ-score | +53 |
| Standard deviation (StdDev) | 50 |
|
|
|
Distribution of the answers from question 17:
"The course seems important for my education"
|
| Mean of CEQ-score | +56 |
| Standard deviation (StdDev) | 54 |
|
|
Comments
Comments by the students' representatives
De praktiska momenten lyfts fram som roligt och givande delar. Engagemanget från föreläsaren och lärare i kursen uppskattas stort och får beröm. Det som eleverna upplever som svårt eller påfrestande är strukturen i kursen. De kommenterar att bättre struktur och informationsflöde hade gjort kursen lättare att följa.
Comments by the course leader
We are happy to see in the CEQ-answers and submitted comments that the
course is considered to be very relevant and that there was a large
value and appreciation in applying the course contents in hands-on
laboratory sessions and in the student projects.
We had some problems with both the simulation software in the beginning of the course and a hardware issue at the end of the hands-on exercises which caused some delays in the schedule, so had to reschedule and delay some parts, but are grateful for the cooperation from the students involved.
There is intentionally a wide variety in the topics of the course projects and thus what is presented, although several fundamental aspects like calibration issues show up in different forms in most projects.
The students signing up for the course come from different study
programs and background. We therefore see a large value being able to
offer projects which can be tailored towards particular interest and
experiences in a certain domain of robotics and have tried to follow
the recommendations to specify the prerequisites with respect to
e.g., previous programming experience etc.
Some projects are still open-ended and the expected outcomes for these
individual projects were to a larger extent decided within the formed
groups together with the supervisors.
Overall we are very happy with the dedicated and fine work within the
projects and it was very nice to see all the demonstrations at the
project presentation to highlight what can be achieved within the
course.
How the questionnaires were filled in
By web forms.